🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries